Hello there, today is pizza day in US. If eating turkey is a traditional thanksgiving meal, then eating pizza is a traditional before thanksgiving meal. According to a news channel, pizza sales grow from 34% to 200% on this particular day. Eating pizza is supposed to be a warm-up or a stretching kind of thing for thanks giving turkey!
Thanksgiving air traffic has seen 4% rise compared to last year, despite the fact that
24% of them arrived late. According to ATA, estimated 2.5 million people will be traveling on Wednesday before thanks giving. 27 million is the total estimation of the passengers through out the holiday season in November.That's huge!
iPhone goes contract free in Germany. Cool isn't it? No, not so fast. T-mobile, who was official carrier for iphone and lost its case to Vodafone, is offering this contract-free iphone for 999Euros(1500$). This is pretty disappointing. Will this be a good news to iphone customers? I seriously doubt it. At such a huge price, it is certainly out of reach for most of the population. I hope apple gives it a serious thought and come up with some reasonable price.
Google's "I'am feeling lucky" button is being analyzed if it is really lucky for its business. This button usually takes a user directly to a web site instead on giving its user a list of choice. For example, if you type "Pizza" in the google search space and click "I am feeling lucky" button, then it will take you directly to Pizza hut home page. According to
MarketPlace, around 1% of the total google searches are performed using this button. Even though this number seems low, according to Tom Chavez in the article, it is bringing 110 million dollar loss to the company annually. This is becuase, when a user uses this button it will take him directly to a web page and he will not see any google ads which are the revenue makers for this search engine giant. Some people even think that this button is there just to show-off the power of google. Google will be carrying this button, looks like it is feeling lucky about it!
Telugu film actress Arti agarwal got married to one Ujwal Kumar(US techie). Like most of the celebrities in AP, she successfully performed the tradition of beating up Reporters, with the help of her family members. Now family members got arrested. I don't know the inner details of this scoop, but I feel if some celebrity says I need privacy press should respect that. If not this will happen!
Stage set in Firoze shah Kotla stadium for the first test match between India and Pakistan on Thursday November 22nd. Kumble will be the captain for team India. A lot of expectations are on the senior team which includes the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, V.V.S. Laxman and Anil Kumble. The Pace duo RP Singh and Sreeshant are out of the series, and Yuvraj Singh on bench. I have always been a big fan of Kumble. This guy can do some serious damage with his leg spin. Hope India will perform to its potential and win this series! Good Luck team!
Well Guys.. Happy Holidays!!
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Aquisitions
Every time I hear this term, knowingly or unknowingly I think about that for a moment. Lately I have been hearing this term every day. The latest trend in the IT market is to set up a start up, gain some user base and advertise its potential to some big players in the market and merge with one of them. Is it good or bad? Well it has two sides of argument, good because it will be integrated with a large suite, more money for development and more marketing. Bad because of layoffs, dominance of few market players and loss of product individuality. Whatever may be the effect, acquisitions keep happening. One of the interesting thing about acquisitions is that they keep me guessing about how a company is planning its growth. For example Google, this one has a wide variety of acquisitions. It has acquired many firms which have products varying from social networking portal in mobiles to wireless softwares to video conferencing to network file sharing to online office softwares. It has a very good strategic approach in its acquisitions unlike others. For example eBAY, which acquired Skype few months back. I was perplexed by this aquisition, basic question: why would a bidding site needs a VOIP product? I thought it was a bad move, and now we have news indicating that ebay overpaid for Skype and it has been under-performing after the acquisition. There are few rumors now that Google is planning to take over Skype from eBay. This move by Google(if true) makes perfect sense because of the open handset alliance initiation by google, and Skype VOIP mobile system fits this model perfectly.
Now here are some big acquisitions that happened in the recent past, which opened up so many questions to think about.
SAP taking over Business Objects, Yup the ERP giant is sleeving up to take over BI giant. Many say this might be a result of
Oracle taking over Hyperion early this year and I think they have a point. Oracle with its strategic acquisitions like that of people-soft was already poising a threat to SAP's business. With the addition on Hyperion now it has entered the BI arena, only to make its suite even more powerful. SAP has a pretty good customer base in the Enterprise applications, now BO will give it an opportunity to explore data warehousing and BI arena. Is this good or bad? It really depends on what SAP does with BO. Right now it stated that BO will be a separate entity. If it continues to keep it like that, its good. But if SAP tries to integrate BO into its exisiting software to give its customers more functionality, then there is a good chance of loosing BO's customer base. SAP may also invest in enhancing existing BO tool. We need to wait and see what will its approach be! What are other players in the BI world doing? Well they are doing their own strategic acquisitions, to protect their position in market. IBM took over another BI giant Cognos, to enhance its information on demand suite. As the article indicates, it has already done many such acquisitions and Cognos only adds strength to its ideas. Also SAS takes over Netezza, Informatica takes over composite software, etc. Tough competition going on there in BI market.
Coming to other areas, Google acquires a Jaiku, a so-called micro-blogging website. According to google blog, this will help people to stay in touch with their loved ones either from a computer or from mobile. Where will google use this application is still to be answered, after all google want to do everything. Web search, images, videos, mobiles, office, maps and its money maker ads. So, at least for me, its difficult to see where will it use this particular technology!!
Cisco adds securent, a policy management software firm. According to eWeek, The acquisition brings to Cisco technology that allows customers to administer, audit and enforce access policies to a wide range of applications, data and infrastructure. eBAY acquires an online sales tool called Afterbuy.com. This on-line tool can be used for inventory management and pre-sales management. Hopefully this acquisition will not turn out like Skype.
So, acquisitions can bring a company good business or kill the same. How strategic a company is in its acquisitions depends on the fields that a company wants to grow. Acquisitions continue to happen because no one wants to reinvent a wheel!
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Android - will it kick iphone's apps?
There were many speculations about the so-called "G-Phone" in last few months. Google finally came out of its shell and yet again proved its dominance. Every product from Google is a revolution in itself. Search engine has completely integrated in our lives, likewise its maps application and even Orkut. For this very reason, I am very excited about its products. I personally use google search a zillion times every day, chat with my friends on gtalk, interact with them via Orkut and use google maps to get my directions. Many people don't even realize that they use google so intensively for their day to day activities. I am definitely looking forward for the Google Mobile. The coolest thing about this phone is that one can write their own application and use it. If you can spend time understanding Android Platform(the Google-initiated, Linux-based open source mobile operating system) and have a programming back ground, then you are the boss of your phone. What if you don't have a programming back ground? well, there are always communities for you. Soon there will be a large Android community, who will develop many applications. Open source community is huge and for Android it is called Open Handset Alliance. And in no case this is an advertisement for Google's mobile. I know when they get to the advertisements part, trust me they will do much better than this.
Here is a sneek peek of what Android platform has to offer:
Well for those of you who are interested to develop something for Android, here is a video showing basics of Android coding. Now, here is the best part. Google announced a $10 Million developer challenge. Prize price ranges from $25000 to $275,000. According to google, the first phase of the competition runs from January 2nd through March 3rd, 2008 and the second phase will take place in the second half of 2008.
This Video below gives you a basic idea of "how to program Android". Google has already developed many API's that you can use directly. For more details please visit Android home page.
Here is a sneek peek of what Android platform has to offer:
Well for those of you who are interested to develop something for Android, here is a video showing basics of Android coding. Now, here is the best part. Google announced a $10 Million developer challenge. Prize price ranges from $25000 to $275,000. According to google, the first phase of the competition runs from January 2nd through March 3rd, 2008 and the second phase will take place in the second half of 2008.
This Video below gives you a basic idea of "how to program Android". Google has already developed many API's that you can use directly. For more details please visit Android home page.
Friday, November 9, 2007
Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A simple question sometime will make people think things in a completely different way. I found this article on a blog. Author uses simple questions and a simple scenario to make his point. A kid asking his dad, why us attacked Iraq. I am not here judging whether US did a right thing or a terrible thing going to war on Iraq. No thats not my idea. Its their money and they can spend it any which way they want. Well, just read this article and you will know my point. [http://www.geocities.com/anarchiebunker/foreignpolicy.htm - original post]
Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction.
Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?
A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.
Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A: To use them in a war, silly.
Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.
Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons with which they could have fought back?
A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.
Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q: And what was that?
A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.
Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q: Kind of like what they do in China?
A: Don’t go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.
Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it’s a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A: Right.
Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Isn’t that exactly what happens in China?
A: I told you, China is different.
Q: What’s the difference between China and Iraq?
A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba’ath party, while China is Communist.
Q: Didn’t you once tell me Communists were bad?
A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Like in Iraq?
A: Exactly.
Q: And like in China, too?
A: I told you, China’s a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.
Q: How come Cuba isn’t a good economic competitor?
A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.
Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn’t that help the Cubans become capitalists?
A: Don’t be a smart-ass.
Q: I didn’t think I was being one.
A: Well, anyway, they also don’t have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he’s not really a legitimate leader anyway.
Q: What’s a military coup?
A: That’s when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.
Q: Didn’t the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.
Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.
Q: Didn’t you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?
A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.
Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?
A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.
Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men – fifteen of them Saudi Arabians – hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings in New York and Washington, killing 3,000 innocent people.
Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.
Q: Aren’t the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people’s heads and hands?
A: Yes, that’s exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people’s heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.
Q: Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?
A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.
Q: Fighting drugs?
A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.
Q: How did they do such a good job?
A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.
Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people’s heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people’s heads and hands off for other reasons?
A: Yes. It’s OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people’s hands for growing flowers, but it’s cruel if they cut off people’s hands for stealing bread.
Q: Don’t they also cut off people’s hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?
A: That’s different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.
Q: Don’t Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.
Q: What’s the difference?
A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers.
Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A: Now, don’t go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.
Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.
A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
Q: Who trained them?
A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.
Q: Was he from Afghanistan?
A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.
Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?
A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.
Q: So the Soviets – I mean, the Russians – are now our friends?
A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we’re mad at them now. We’re also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn’t help us invade Iraq either.
Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.
Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn’t do what we want them to do?
A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.
Q: But wasn’t Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?
A: Well, yeah. For a while.
Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.
Q: Why did that make him our friend?
A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.
Q: Isn’t that when he gassed the Kurds?
A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.
Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?
A: Most of the time, yes.
Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?
A: Sometimes that’s true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.
Q: Why?
A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America’s side, anyone who opposes war is a godless unAmerican Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?
Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A: Yes.
Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?
A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.
Q: So basically, what you’re saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Q: Good night, Daddy.
Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction.
Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?
A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.
Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A: To use them in a war, silly.
Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.
Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons with which they could have fought back?
A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.
Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q: And what was that?
A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.
Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q: Kind of like what they do in China?
A: Don’t go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.
Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it’s a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A: Right.
Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Isn’t that exactly what happens in China?
A: I told you, China is different.
Q: What’s the difference between China and Iraq?
A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba’ath party, while China is Communist.
Q: Didn’t you once tell me Communists were bad?
A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q: Like in Iraq?
A: Exactly.
Q: And like in China, too?
A: I told you, China’s a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.
Q: How come Cuba isn’t a good economic competitor?
A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.
Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn’t that help the Cubans become capitalists?
A: Don’t be a smart-ass.
Q: I didn’t think I was being one.
A: Well, anyway, they also don’t have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he’s not really a legitimate leader anyway.
Q: What’s a military coup?
A: That’s when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.
Q: Didn’t the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.
Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.
Q: Didn’t you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?
A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.
Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?
A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.
Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men – fifteen of them Saudi Arabians – hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings in New York and Washington, killing 3,000 innocent people.
Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.
Q: Aren’t the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people’s heads and hands?
A: Yes, that’s exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people’s heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.
Q: Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?
A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.
Q: Fighting drugs?
A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.
Q: How did they do such a good job?
A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.
Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people’s heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people’s heads and hands off for other reasons?
A: Yes. It’s OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people’s hands for growing flowers, but it’s cruel if they cut off people’s hands for stealing bread.
Q: Don’t they also cut off people’s hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?
A: That’s different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.
Q: Don’t Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.
Q: What’s the difference?
A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers.
Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A: Now, don’t go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.
Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.
A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
Q: Who trained them?
A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.
Q: Was he from Afghanistan?
A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.
Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?
A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.
Q: So the Soviets – I mean, the Russians – are now our friends?
A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we’re mad at them now. We’re also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn’t help us invade Iraq either.
Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.
Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn’t do what we want them to do?
A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.
Q: But wasn’t Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?
A: Well, yeah. For a while.
Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.
Q: Why did that make him our friend?
A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.
Q: Isn’t that when he gassed the Kurds?
A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.
Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?
A: Most of the time, yes.
Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?
A: Sometimes that’s true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.
Q: Why?
A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America’s side, anyone who opposes war is a godless unAmerican Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?
Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A: Yes.
Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?
A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.
Q: So basically, what you’re saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Q: Good night, Daddy.
Monday, November 5, 2007
Funny interviews!
Cyrus Broacha - also known as "Raja Of Rubbish" among his inner circle is one of my favorite comedian celebrity. I grew up watching his shows like Bakra, Baap of Bakra, Dada of Bakra and all those members of Bakra family along with Fully-faltoo on MTV.
Even today when I see his name against any article or a video, I see them. I found this video on IBN CNN, which is doing a show called "The week that wasn't" with Cyrus. Have fun watching a small episodes of his show.
Cyrus takes on vengsarkar
Cyrus interrogation
Even today when I see his name against any article or a video, I see them. I found this video on IBN CNN, which is doing a show called "The week that wasn't" with Cyrus. Have fun watching a small episodes of his show.
Cyrus takes on vengsarkar
Cyrus interrogation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
